The Misogyny of Paul (Part 12)

Xian and Muslim Sex Discrimination Confronted

Next, scraptures from the letter attributed to Peter are cited to see if the reader spots anything that looks or sounds fishy.
I Peter 3.1 Likewise, you wives, you shall be in subjection to your own husbands so that if any husbands do not obey the Word of God, they may be won over to God by hearing the conversation of the wives without their ever even hearing the Word of God 2due to their beholding the chaste conversation of you wives coupled with fear.

Did any of that ring a bell, Christian? No? Then see if these little sniplets from Paul's other letters sounds familiar.
Ephesians 5.22 Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands as unto the Lord, 23for the husband is the head of the wife even as Christ is the head of the church, and he is the savior of the body. 24Therefore, as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be subject to their own husbands in everything, I Corinthians 7.14 for the unbelieving husband is sanctified by the wife, and the unbelieving wife is sanctified by the husband.

Now let's again compare scraptures from I Peter to Paul's scraptures written in his other letters.
I Peter 3.3 Wives, regarding your adorning, let it not be that of the outward adorning of the plaiting of your hair, wearing of gold, or putting on apparel, [Sic, sick, sick] 4but let your adornment be the hidden man of the heart and of that which is not corruptible -- even the ornament of a meek and quiet spirit which is worthy of a great price in the sight of God.

Now compare that to:
I Timothy 3.9 In like manner also, I command that women adorn themselves in modest apparel with shamefacedness and sobriety -- not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array, 10but with good works which are becoming to women who profess godliness.
I Timothy 2.11 Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection, 12for I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.

Now in case you still don't get it, Paul forged I and II Peter. That is PAUL talking, not Peter. Peter would not have told women that in order to be righteous, they had to shut up and submit to being dominated by their husbands. Peter would not have wasted his breath issuing edicts that commanded women to style their hair in any given way, told women what clothes they were required to wear, and/or claimed that wearing jewelry is a sin. These commandments are Paul's / Satan's blasphemies. God's children -- including Peter -- care very little about external appearances.

Here comes another clue that PAUL, not Peter, forged these letters and attributed them to Peter -- that clue being Paul's distortion and abuse of Old Testament scriptures.
I Peter 3.5 For after this manner did the holy women of old who trusted in God adorn themselves. They were also in subjection to their own husbands. 6After all, in Genesis 18.12, Sarah called Abraham her lord. By calling Abraham her lord, even Sara obeyed Abraham. Thus, you women are Sara's daughters, and have thereby gained salvation for as long as you do well by:
obeying me,
calling your husband, "Lord,"
not being afraid of God for doing so, and
not expressing any amazement when you hear me issue commandments that war against Jesus' Doctrine that, for instance, tells us, "Call no man your Master." So there!

Well, have I got news for you. In Exodus 11.2, the Lord tells us,
"Speak now in the ears of the people, and let every man borrow of his neighbor, and let every woman borrow of her neighbor jewels of silver and jewels of gold."

Wearing jewelry is not a sin. Although I did not borrow jewelry while I was in the Exodus, I was flabbergasted when relatives gave me their jewelry. By the time that happened, I had already studied The Exodus, and knew exactly what was going on. God is He who gave my relatives the idea to give me the jewelry they didn't want anymore.

Second of all, God's female children are not Sarah's daughters.
Sarah seduced Abraham into committing adultery by telling him to take on Hagar to be his wife, too, so that Hagar would give Sarah a child by Abraham.
Once Hagar's son Ishmael was born, Sarah turned into a jealous cat, and commanded Abraham to toss out Hagar and Ishmael at the risk of Hagar and Ishmael thirsting and starving to death. That's how polygamy effects people, Muslims and Mormons.

I do not want to be like that at all, nor should any woman want to be like that.

Paul's letter entitled I Peter continues:
I Peter 3.7 Likewise, you husbands, you shall dwell with your wife according to your knowledge of, and obedience to, my commandments. Thou shalt give honor unto the wife as if you were honoring the weaker vessel between the two of you, and as if you were both heirs together of the grace of life. And thou shalt obey my commandments just so that your prayers will not be hindered from being heard and/or answered by God.

So you like that scrapture, do you, Xyin? Well then, how about taking a whif of these scraptures from old Babble-on's letters wherein the word vessel/s appear.
Romans 9.21 Has not the potter power over the clay? Doesn't the potter have the power to take one lump of clay to make one vessel honorable and another vessel dishonorable? 22Well then, what if God were willing to show His wrath and to make His power known? What would you think of that? What if instead of doing that, however, He endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath He made fit for destruction 23just so that He might make known the riches of His glory on you vessels of mercy which He had prepared beforehand to be vessels of glory? Babble, babble, babble.
II Timothy 2.20 But in a great house, not only are there vessels of gold and of silver, but also of wood and of earth. Some of those vessels are honorable, but some are dishonorable. 21If a man therefore purges himself from these honorable and dishonorable vessels, he shall be a vessel unto honor himself who is sanctified, meet for the Master's use, and prepared unto every good work. Babble, babble, babble.

But the following is my personal favorite.
I Thessalonians 4.3 For the following commandment is the will of God that, when obeyed, even serves for your sanctification. "Thou shalt abstain from fornication 4so that every one of you shall know how to possess his vessel, (i.e., his penis!) in sanctification and honor."

Hmm. So even your weenie gets sanctified, eh, Christyin crotch pots? How S-P-E-C-I-A-L.

Back to Paul's letter entitled I Peter with pieces of Paul's scraptures from his other letters highlighted for the purpose of comparison.
I Peter 3.8 Finally, be you all of one mind.
Romans 12.16 Be of the same mind one toward another.
Romans 15.5 Now may the God of patience and consolation grant you to be likeminded one toward another according to Christ Jesus, 6so that you may with one mind and one mouth glorify God, even the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.
I Corinthians 1.10 Now I beseech you brothers, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you, but that you be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment.
Philippians 2.2 Fulfill my joy, you Christians, by all of you being likeminded, having the same love, and being of one accord and of one mind.
II Corinthians 13.11 Finally, brothers, farewell. Be perfect. Be of good comfort. Be of one mind. Live in peace. And the God of love and peace shall be with you.

Paul's, "Thou shalt all think alike!" demandments are abSAULootely bizarre, totally unrealistic, and oppositional / combative toward's humanity's gaining salvation. No two people think alike, nor can we. God's Doctrine is loaded with paradoxical commandments meant to be applied to each person's situation in life. What may be the right thing for me to do in my situation may be wrong for you to do in your situation. Therein is one of the primary reasons why each of us must study the Lord's Doctrine, and then let the Master's Spirit pop the appropriate scripture to follow into each person's mind according to our individual needs.

I Peter 3.8 aligned with scraptures from Paul's other letters continues:
I Peter 3.8 Thou shalt have compassion one of another. Thou shalt love as brothers. Thou shalt be pitiful. Thou shalt be courteous. 9Thou shalt not render evil for evil, or railing for railing, but contrariwise, thou shalt render blessing for evil and blessing for railing knowing that you are thereunto called so that you should inherit a blessing.
Romans 12.17 Recompense to no man evil for evil.
I Thessalonians 5.15 See that none renders evil for evil unto any man, but ever follow that which is good, both among yourselves, and to all men.

Are you still not convinced that Paul forged I and II Peter, Christian? Then let's try it again. The word lucre (from the Latin word lucrum meaning "reward") which is defined as "monetary gain, profit, money" appears in the Bible six times, once in I Samuel 8.3, and the remainder in Paul's letters including I Peter 5.2. Even though our receiving rewards, monetary gain, profit, and money is not a sin at all, Paul always preceeds the word lucre with the adjective filthy as if God's fulfilling Luke 10.7, "The laborer is worthy of his hire," for His children were "Bad, bad, bad!" Watch.
I Timothy 3.2 A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behavior, given to hospitality, apt to teach, 3not given to wine, no striker, not greedy of filthy lucre, but patient, not a brawler, not covetous, 4one that rules well his own house, having his children in subjection with all gravity, 5(for if a man knows not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?) 6Not a novice, lest being lifted up with pride he falls into the condemnation of the devil. 7Moreover he must have a good report of those who are without (non-Christians) lest he fall into reproach and the snare of the devil. 8Likewise must the deacons be grave, not doubletongued, not given to much wine, not greedy of filthy lucre, 9holding the mystery of the faith in a pure conscience. 10And let these also first be proved. Then let them use the office of a deacon, being found blameless.
Titus 1.7 For a bishop must be blameless as the steward of God, not selfwilled, not soon angry, not given to wine, no striker, not given to filthy lucre, 8but a lover of hospitality, a lover of good men, sober, just, holy, temperate, 9holding fast the faithful word as he has been taught so that he may be able by sound doctrine both to exhort and to convince the gainsayers, 10for there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, especially they of the circumcision (Jews) 11whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses teaching things which they ought not for filthy lucre's sake.
1 Peter 5.1 To the elders which are among you, I, who am also an elder, a witness of the sufferings of Christ, and also a partaker of the glory that shall be revealed, exhort you to 2feed the flock of God which is among you taking the oversight thereof, not by constraint, but willingly; not for filthy lucre, but of a ready mind.

So now the reader might be asking, "Why would Paul go to the trouble of forging letters attributed to Peter?" The primary answers are gleaned from knowing that the people back then knew of Peter's reputation as the Lord's leading disciple and the rock upon whom Jesus would build His church. Because what Paul was preaching warred against what Peter was preaching, Paul wrote the letters and forged Peter's name to them in order to deceive people into believing that:
Peter was preaching the same God-spiel that Paul preached, and
Peter considered Paul to be a Spiritual brother.

All the while, Peter and James wrote the letter confronting Paul's great apostasy which, as has already been stated, Paul's Christyins destroyed.

In addition to I and II Peter being loaded with Paul's dogmanure, the following scraptures from II Peter provide further evidence that Paul wrote these two letters attributed to Peter.
II Peter 3.14 Wherefore, beloved, seeing that you look for such things, be diligent that you may be found of Christ Jesus to be in peace, without a spot of dirt, and blameless. 15And thou shalt account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation -- even as our beloved brother Paul has also said according to the wisdom given to him, as he has written unto you. 16And as also he says in all his letters. All of his letters speak of these things.
Yes, I realize that some things spoken in Paul's letters are hard to understand. Only the people who are unlearned and unstable wrestle with themselves by having difficulty understanding what Paul is saying in his letters, though, so it's all their fault, not his. Such people have the same problem wrestling due to their inability to understand other scriptures in the Bible, too. So there! Their inability to understand what Paul is saying shall work to their own destruction in Hell. So don't blame our beloved brother Paul for their difficulties perceiving what he was saying. Blame them instead! Heh-heh.

Now here is a situation wherein the question is not whether I have proven that Paul forged I and II Peter, but whether you people will believe the proof provided. If you want to continue believing Paul, you can do that, but if you do, you can also expect to be a hot shot in a hot spot for eternity.

Who's Online

We have 103 guests and no members online