The Misogyny of Paul (Part 8)

Xian and Muslim Sex Discrimination Confronted

Now check out old Babble-on's yammer regarding virginity, bachelorhood, marriage, and divorce; i.e., Paul's attempts to manipulate and control, and thereby, to destroy human relationships -- including the intimacy of the marital union.
I Corinthians 7.25 Now concerning virgins I have no commandment of the Lord: yet I give my judgment, as one that hath obtained mercy of the Lord to be faithful.
26 I suppose therefore that this is good for the present distress, I say, that it is good for a man so to be.
27 Art thou bound unto a wife? seek not to be loosed. Art thou loosed from a wife? seek not a wife.
28 But and if thou marry, thou hast not sinned; and if a virgin marry, she hath not sinned. Nevertheless such shall have trouble in the flesh: but I spare you.
29 But this I say, brethren, the time is short: it remaineth, that both they that have wives be as though they had none;
30 And they that weep, as though they wept not; and they that rejoice, as though they rejoiced not; and they that buy, as though they possessed not;
31 And they that use this world, as not abusing it: for the fashion of this world passeth away.
32 But I would have you without carefulness. He that is unmarried careth for the things that belong to the Lord, how he may please the Lord:
33 But he that is married careth for the things that are of the world, how he may please his wife.
34 There is difference also between a wife and a virgin. The unmarried woman careth for the things of the Lord, that she may be holy both in body and in spirit: but she that is married careth for the things of the world, how she may please her husband.
35 And this I speak for your own profit; not that I may cast a snare upon you, but for that which is comely, and that ye may attend upon the Lord without distraction.
36 But if any man think that he behaveth himself uncomely toward his virgin, if she pass the flower of her age, and need so require, let him do what he will, he sinneth not: let them marry.
37 Nevertheless he that standeth stedfast in his heart, having no necessity, but hath power over his own will, and hath so decreed in his heart that he will keep his virgin, doeth well.
38 So then he that giveth her in marriage doeth well; but he that giveth her not in marriage doeth better.
39 The wife is bound by the law as long as her husband liveth; but if her husband be dead, she is at liberty to be married to whom she will; only in the Lord.
40 But she is happier if she so abide, after my judgment: and I think also that I have the Spirit of God.

Did you catch at least some of the stereotyping, vacillation, and blasphemies being spewed by the babbling blabber mouth? Since we already know that Christians do not see through it, let's go through it again.
I Corinthians 7.25 I shall answer your questions regarding whether or not virgins should marry. I have been given no commandment by the Lord regarding this topic. The other commandments I issue ARE given to Me by the Lord, however. Heh-heh. Even so, I have obtained the mercy of the Lord, so I yet give you my judgment, and I command you to be faithful to my judgment; i.e., obey ME!

And heeeeeeere comes Paul's judgment.
26 Therefore, I suppose that remaining a virgin for the present distress is good. In other words, I say that it is good for a man to be a virgin. Either that, or I suppose that every man ought to remain in whatever marital status he presently finds himself -- married, single, divorced, or widowed -- regardless of the distress caused by his present marital status. 27After all, if you are married, you are bound to a wife. You are bound in chains and locked in prison held hostage by your wife! Therefore, thou shalt not seek to be loosed from those shackles. [!] But if you are loosed from being chained to a wife, thou shalt not seek a wife! 28But if you disobey me and go ahead and marry again anyway, you have not sinned.
If a virgin marries, she has not sinned. Nevertheless, all married people have sexual problems, but I will spare you the details of explaining how all married couples suffer sexual problems.

Actually, many to most married couples may indeed have intimacy problems, but those problems are primarily due to their failure to believe the Son of God, preferring instead to believe religion's lies regarding what constitutes good and bad, right and wrong sexual behaviors. And Paul is certainly the father of the lie regarding what constitutes appropriate sexual behavior.
29 But this I say, brothers. The time is short. In the time that remains:
The men who have wives are to behave as though they had no wife. Acting like you are married when you are is BAD, BAD, BAD! Go ahead! Remove your wedding band, and screw around on your spouse! And/or go ahead! Withhold sex from your spouse just to be mean, you suckers! Tell him/her that you're supposed to withhold sex so that you can pretend like you're not married, you suckers! Heh-heh.
30The people who weep are to act as though they do not weep, and the people who rejoice are to act as though they do not rejoice. Stuff your feelings! Thou shalt not express your emotions honestly, because expressing your emotions honestly is BAD, BAD, BAD! Then your dishonesty will prevent you from ever making direct, conscious contact with God, you suckers! Heh-heh.
Those people who purchase possessions are to act as though they have no possessions. After all, living a lie and lying like Hell is the ONLY way to make it to Heaven, you suckers! Heh-heh.
31And those people who use this world are to act as if they are not abusing this world.
Why? Because the fashions of this world pass away.

So marriage is only a fashion, eh, Xyin? And expressing our emotions honestly is only a "fashionable" thing to do, eh, Xyin? And what Paul is edicting here makes sense to you, does it, Christian? Apparently you think it does, because almost every single one of you goes around stuffing your feelings, living a lie and lying like Hell, walking around on eggs trying to protect the false image you project of yourselves, pretending to be something and somebody you are not, pretending to believe what you do not believe just so you can fit in with the other members of your particular brand of Christianity, ... And as I have stated repeatedly, being a phony and a liar is the number one practice that separates a human from God. That Paul continuously interjects, "LIE, you suckers!" certainly helps to reveal his identity as the father of the lie, Satan-in-the-flesh, and the anti-Christ.

Now I have some questions for you Christians. Do you honestly believe that a married man is supposed to go around acting like he is not married? No? Then why do you defend Paul? And why do you get all riled up and spew, "ALL scriptures in the Bible are God-ordained!"? Are not your emotions infected with the venom of the viper Satan in a quest to protect, defend, and promote your false beliefs -- even when YOU know that particular scraptures promoted by Paul are completely false, and that nobody at any time in human history was supposed to behave the way that Paul commanded people to behave?

By the way, Charismatics who babble in unknown tongues, PLEASE explain to us what Paul is referring to when he says that the people who use this world are supposed to act like they are not abusing this world. In this context, does "this world" refer to human sexuality and thus, to Christians who abuse it by preying on children, raping women, cheating on their spouse, etc.? If so, do you really think those behaviors are okay just so long as the perpetrator acts like he doesn't commit sex crimes? Or is Paul referring to people using natural resources? If you think that is what he means, does every person who uses natural resources automatically abuse those natural resources? Does every person who drinks water abuse natural resources? What is the drunk-as-a-skunk Babble-on talking about?
32 Now mind you, MY will is that I would have you be careless. Mean old God, however, commands you to be careful, so if you do not like what I command you to do, blame mean old God, not me! Heh-heh.
All bachelors care for the things that belong to the Lord, and are centered in wanting to know how they may please the Lord.
33All married men, however, care for the things that are of the world; i.e., the married man seeks to know what he can do to please his wife.
Therefore, all married men are BAD, BAD, BAD because they are distracted away from caring for the things that belong to the Lord and from wanting to know what they can do to please the Lord.

Aha! We didn't even need the input of the Charismatics in order to perceive Paul's babble. The "they that use this world" to whom Paul was referring back in verse 31 refers to the people who have sex, including married couples. Thus, Paul was claiming, "All people who have sexual intercourse are abusing this world, so they are to pretend like they NEVER have sex!" But you don't blaspheme God and the holiness of the marital union when you repeat these lies that claim having sexual intercourse with one's spouse is an "abuse of this world," eh? So THAT'S why so many of you Christians fail to educate your children about the human reproductive system, eh? According to Paul, it's improper to talk about it, because having sex with your spouse is an abuse of this world, eh? And that's why Paul-o'ticks, sex, and reLegion are such taboo topics, eh?

Too bad. How sad, because my studying the human reproductive system prior to my Spiritual Conception was one of the most awesome educational experiences of my life that opened up my heart, mind, and soul to the probability of God's existence. When I saw a video of the sperm and egg in action, I couldn't help but ask myself, "What gives life to life? What is the force behind the force? What creates life inside those sperm in the first place?" The only answer that made a lick of good sense was, "God."

These are the scraptures from which the Cataholic church seeks to justify its claim that all of her priestatutes must be bachelors. So you priests think that you are better than Moses, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Noah, David, Samuel..., eh? Hmm. So when you bachelor hoods are molesting little boys, having homosexual affairs or affairs with your perishoners, what "things" that belong to the Lord are you focused on? Are you really wanting to know how you can please Him? In what way are you seeking to please Him?
34 There is also a big difference between a married woman and a virgin.
All unmarried women care for the things of the Lord so that they may be holy both in body and in spirit.
All married women, however, care for the things of the world; i.e., the married woman cares about knowing how she may please her husband.
Therefore, all married women are BAD, BAD, BAD, because all married women stop caring about the things of the Lord, and all of them stop wanting to know how they can be holy both in body and spirit.
And therefore, it is BAD, BAD, BAD for a woman to be married, and marriage is a no-no in the eyes of God.
35 I speak about this for your own profit -- not so I may cast a snare upon you, but so I can inform you of that which is comely, and so you may attend upon the Lord without any of the entrapments, bondage, imprisonment, and distractions of marriage.

Oh, really? Paul admitted from the beginning that these scraptures were merely an expression of his judgment. Take heed, Christian, because the Lord says:
"With what judgment you judge, you shall be judged. And with what measure you mete, it shall be measured to you again." Matthew 7.2

So tell us Christian, are Paul's claims true? Do all bachelors seek to know and do the will the God? Is marriage such a distraction that no married people want to know and do the will of God? Is it true that Moses, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, David, Noah, Samuel, Peter, etc. did not seek to do the will of God? If you do not believe Paul's claims, what are you doing teaching and preaching these lies? Are you not aware that every time you repeat these lies, you are wickedly falsely accusing all married people including the majority of God's prophets? Did it never occur to you that spouses can indeed seek to know and do the will of God, and that seeking to know how to please one's spouse -- including sexually -- is included as being in obedience to God's will for married couples as long as the sexual practice does not oppose His Doctrine? No? What a surprise.

Blatantly obvious is Islam's complete ignorance of God's will for appropriate sexual behavior in joining two people into one flesh, too. Watch.
Female circumcision, also called female genital mutilation ... involves removing part or all of a girl's clitoris and labia in an effort to reduce female sexual desire and thereby preserve chastity. FGH is widespread in sub-Saharan Africa and in Egypt, with scattered cases in Asia and other parts of the Middle East. The World Health Organization estimates that up to 140 million girls and women have undergone the procedure. Some Muslims believe it is mandated by Islam, but the practice predates Muhammad and is also common among some Christian communities. "The Women of Islam," by Lisa Beyer. Time Magazine. December 3, 2001, p. 55.

Lisa Beyer's paragraph reveals so much about the motivations of the people who perform such acts. You Christians and Muslims who participate in that obscenity are informing us loud and clear that you do not give a hoot about females. Sexual intercourse is just supposed to provide you selfish, self-serving, self-promoting, self-exalting dickheads with pleasure, right? "Screw her!" right?

Will you crotch pots cut off the female's genitalia to remove your wife's ability to gain pleasure from sexual intercourse with you -- sexual pleasure that God Himself uses to bond husband and wife into one flesh -- and yet attempt to convince me that you obey the will of God? Don't waste your breath, you selfish, grandiose, self-aggrandizing cocks of the walk! I know better.

I'll tell you something else. Inside myself, I do not understand why any man would not want his wife to enjoy having sex with him. I don't. And it's good that I don't understand it, because it doesn't make sense at all. That is one of the reasons why God calls Paul and Muhammad -- false prophets who cast the marital union asunder -- Babble-on.

Now listen again -- carefully this time -- to what the Savior says regarding marriage.
"Have you not read that He which made them at the beginning made them male and female, and said, 'For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife, and they twain shall be one flesh'? Wherefore, they are no more twain, but one flesh. What, therefore, God has joined together, let not man put asunder." Matthew 19.4-6

When you cut off a female's genitalia, you are putting asunder the marital union, thereby willfully defying the will of God. Two people being joined together into one flesh means that each spouse is supposed to be treating the other as if the two of them formed of one flesh. What that means is that the modesty we feel in the presence of other people is removed in the presence of our spouse. We tell our partner what pleases us sexually, ask our partner what pleases him/her sexually, and then try to provide that pleasure for one another. The only qualification is that what provides sexual pleasure must be in line with the will of God. That means no fornication, adultery, or lasciviousness is sanctioned by God.

Notice, too, that the Savior says, wife, not wives, and they twain/TWO become one one flesh. You Muslims and Mormons can scream until you are blue in the face promoting polygamy, but NEVER did or will God sanction it. Polygamy is adultery, and is WAY out of line with the will of God. Got it?

Now here comes a verse that is loaded with poison. First, the verse is quoted as is given in the King James version.
36 But if any man think that he behaveth himself uncomely toward his virgin, if she pass the flower of her age, and need so require, let him do what he will, he sinneth not: let them marry.

To what virgin is Paul referring: a man's virgin penis, or a virgin female after whom the Christian male lusts? If the virgin to whom Paul refers is a female after whom the Christian male lusts, where does Paul get off referring to her as "his virgin"?

That verse 36 is so open to interpretation helps to explain why Christianity is so divided with each sect interpreting Paul's scraptures any way they want to. So let's see some of the ways that verse can be interpreted.
36 If any man thinks that he behaves himself in an uncomely way towards his virgin penis by masturbating while mentally lusting after a specific woman, and his sexual needs require that he have sex with her, let him do what he will to her. He does not sin. Further, thou shalt let them marry. That woman must have passed beyond child-bearing years before he is allowed to marry her, however.

Or
36 If any man thinks that he behaves himself in an uncomely way by making sexual advances towards a female virgin after whom he lusts, and his sexual needs require that he have sex with her, let him do what he will to her. Let him rape her! He does not sin. After all, she is HIS virgin / HIS property. Further, thou shalt let them marry. His female virgin must be beyond the beauty of her youth and/or child-bearing years before thou shalt let him marry her, however.

Any way that you Christians attempt to decipher that verse, Paul not only exposes his lunacy, but his hatred for and degradation of women, and male ownership of females. AARGH!
37 Nevertheless, he that stands stedfast in his heart to Christ Jesus has no necessity for sexual intercourse. Therefore, he is better than the married man. Such a stedfast man has power over his own will, and has so decreed in his heart that he will keep his virginity. Therefore, he does well compared to the married man who does bad by being married and having sex with his wife.

Paul was attempting to seduce Christians into believing that any human can abstain from sexual intercourse by self will, and that celibate people are better than people who have sex. That is not necessarily true. Because God sensitizes us in every way, for most of us, the human sex drive does not decrease, but INCREASE with the gaining of Spirituality. Paul was merely falsely accusing Spirit-led people, and attempting to deceive them into believing that since their sex drive increased, they were "BAD, BAD, BAD!" AARGH!

In addition, of course, Paul was infecting the Christian mind with promoting iniquity -- the uneven, unfair, unjust treatment of people. In this case, the iniquity is based on gender and marital status. What an oinker!
38 So then, he that gives her in marriage does well, but he that gives her not in marriage does even better.

If the "her" to whom Paul refers is a female instead of the penis, Paul implies that a male has ownership over the woman. And whoever he may be that gives the woman to marriage or forces her to remain unmarried is he who "does well." What a crock.

Of course, all one has to do is insert one little preposition in order to discern another message that the devil may have been attempting to send, that message being:
38 So then, he that gives to her in marriage does well, but he that gives to her not in marriage does even better.

And in that case, because Paul has already claimed that being celibate makes a person holier than the married person who has sexual intercourse, Paul would be infecting the mind of the Christian husband with the belief that his intentionally withholding sex from his wife would be proper and would result in his being holier. Wrongo!
39 The wife is bound by the Law of God to remain in her marriage for as long as her husband lives. But if her husband is dead, she is at liberty to be married to whomever she will. Well, except that her marriage shall only be in the Lord.

That the marriage shall be "only in the Lord" is one of the scraptures the Cataholic church uses to attempt to justify her claim that the only marriages sanctioned by God are those that are performed in a Catholic church -- which is, of course, just another of the whore's bald-faced lies. God unites any and all married couples who practice monogomy into one flesh regardless of where they were married, and regardless of whether or not they are Spirit-led. That is why divorce is so painful for most monogomous people.
40 But she is happier if she so abide, after my judgment: and I think also that I have the Spirit of God.

And there we have yet another verse that is deliberately open to interpretation so that Paul's Christians would divide from one another arguing over the "correct" interpretation. So tell us, Christian, which interpretation is correct?
40 But she is happier if she so abide, after my judgment, in celibacy: and I think also that I have the Spirit of God.

Or
40 But she is happier if she so abide, after my judgment, in her first marriage: and I think also that I have the Spirit of God.

Or
40 But she is happier if she so abide, after my judgment, celibate after being widowed, and not marrying again: and I think also that I have the Spirit of God.

Or
40 But she is happier if she so abide, after my judgment, in agreeing to be raped while she is a young virgin, and remaining unmarried until her youthful beauty is gone and/or she is beyond child-bearing years: and I think also that I have the Spirit of God.

Or
40 But she is happier if she so abide, after my judgment, like I do in homosexuality: and I think also that I have the Spirit of God.

Or
40 But she is happier if she so abide, after my judgment, vacillating back and forth trying to decide whether being married is right or wrong, good or bad: and I think also that I have the Spirit of God.

Or
40 But she is happier if she so abide in total subjection to my judgment not knowing right from wrong, good from evil: and I think also that I have the Spirit of God.


Who's Online

We have 71 guests and no members online