The Misogyny of Paul (Part 5)

Xian and Muslim Sex Discrimination Confronted

In the following dogmanure, Paul agains misuses the story of the Creation in order to attempt to sanction his vicious degradation, exploitation, and abuse of females.
1 Corinthians 11.1 Be ye followers of me, even as I also am of Christ.
2 Now I praise you, brethren, that ye remember me in all things, and keep the ordinances, as I delivered them to you.
3 But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.
4 Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoureth his head.
5 But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven.
6 For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.
7 For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man.
8 For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man.
9 Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.
10 For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head because of the angels.
11 Nevertheless neither is the man without the woman, neither the woman without the man, in the Lord.
12 For as the woman is of the man, even so is the man also by the woman; but all things of God.
13 Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered?
14 Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him?
15 But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for a covering.
16 But if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the churches of God.

Stark naked, Paul is saying the following.
1 Corinthians 11.1 Thou shalt be followers of me, even as I also am of Christ! Now you can take that statement in one of three ways.
Either I mean that thou shalt follow me because I follow Jesus, and therefore teach and preach what Jesus preaches,
or you can take that to mean that I am such a super-duper hot-shot that I AM another Christ,
or you can take that to mean that since I do not follow Christ, you should disobey Him like I do.
However you interpret it is fine with me just so long as you Christians OBEY MY COMMANDMENTS and war against one another over interpretation! Heh-heh. 2And at least for now, I shall praise you brothers if you remember to think about me in everything that you do, and obey the ordinances that I command you to obey in everything that you do! You suckers! Heh-heh.

Just those two scraptures are enough to warn us to not follow Paul, because every child of God says, "Follow Jesus Himself, not me!"

In addition, Paul is seducing his Christians into minding him no matter what despicable acts he commands them to perform the same way that the Japanese followed their great false god, the Japanese emperor during World War II. The Japanese were taught, "If you die while raping, torturing, mutilating and murdering, and seducing Japanese civilians into committing suicide, the great god-king Emperor Hirohito will worship you!" And the dumb-founded Japanese warrior actually believed that nonsense, and went on to commit some of the most sub-human acts ever known to mankind, including hara-kiri.
3 But I would have you know that:
the head of every man is Christ,
the head of every woman is the man, and
the head of Christ is God.

And you believe that, do you, Christian? Well, Hitler was a male. So when Hitler was ordering millions of Jews to be slaughtered in gas chambers, Jesus and ultimately God were they who were commanding Hitler to slaughter the Jews, eh? And a female is only righteous if her husband, brother, father, boyfriend, preacher -- some human male other than Jesus -- controls her thinking and makes all her decisions, eh? But there's no blasphemy there, eh, Christyin?

Now just in case the reader does not know what it is, (and obviously the Christyins don't), stereotyping is when a person sees a certain characteristic, defect or asset in one person, and then applies that characteristic to all humans who possess another of that person's characteristics. For example, the "logic" of a person who stereotypes other people runs like this:
Richard Speck was a white male.
Richard Speck raped and murdered females.
Therefore, all white males rape and murder females.

Or
John Doe was a black male.
John Doe was a drug dealer.
Therefore, all black males are drug dealers.

Or
Einstein was a Jew.
Einstein was a genius.
Therefore, all Jews are geniuses.

And Paul pulled that crap of ludicrously stereotyping people all the time.
4 Therefore, every man who prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonors his head, 5and every woman who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her head.

And you believe that, too, do you, Christian?
Well, IF Jesus were the head of you Christian males, how about explaining to us exactly HOW a man's praying or prophesying with his head covered would be dishonoring Jesus.
And IF a man were the head of a woman, then how about explaining to us how a woman's praying or prophesying with her head uncovered would be dishonoring that man.

Did it never occur to you mindless pissants that IF it were a sin for a man to pray or prophesy with his head covered, or for a woman to pray or prophesy with her head uncovered, God would not allow them to prophesy in the first place? No? What a surprise.

Paul is merely exposing himself as THE greatest of all Pharisees who was attempting to lock Christians into being rigid tight-asses focused on physical appearances rather than on Spirituality and doing the good works commanded by our Father in Heaven. Have the Christians complied with Paul's demandments? Indeed they have. That's why Catholic nuns wear the purdah, Amish and Mennonite women wear those silly bonnets and hats, and why until the 1960's, a Catholic woman would not dare to enter a church without wearing a hat or scarf on her head.

Well, have I got news for you. God does not give a hoot whether or not a child of God's head is covered or uncovered when he/she prays and/or prophesies.

So how do the Muslims obey Satan Paul and Satan Muhammad? Answers:
In the streets of Kabul, you can see something these days that has not been glimpsed there for almost five years--women's faces. Now that the Taliban has fled the city, a few brave women have shed the burka--the head-to-toe garment, to Western eyes a kind of body bag for the living, made mandatory by the defeated religious leadership. ... From the moment in 1996 that the Taliban took power, it sought to make women not just obedient but nonexistent. Not just submissive but invisible. For five years, it almost succeeded. Lifting the Veil, p. 36
The heavy cloth covering can induce panic, claustrophobia and headaches. [An American woman in Afghanistan shown on television said the burka also causes women to pass out during the hot summer months.] It's a psychological hobbling of women that is akin to Chinese foot binding. It's also life threatening. Try negotiating a busy Kabul street--around donkey carts, careening buses and the Taliban roaring by in Datsun pickups--when your hearing is muffled and your vision is reduced to a narrow mesh grid. Lifting the Veil, p. 38.
Afghan women...are emerging from houses that they once could not leave except in the company of a male relative... in a country where people were required to paint their windows black so that passersby could not see the face of any woman who might be at home. Lifting the Veil, p. 36.
Dr. Rahima Zafar Staniczai, head of the Rabia Balkhi hospital for women, remembers how Taliban religious police would beat her in the street any time they caught her rushing to work uncovered: "They would hit us and spit on us...." Lifting the Veil, p. 36.
[A girl named] Masooda... left school five years ago, on the day the Taliban entered her central Afghan town of Kota Sangi and beat her with a cane for not wearing a burka. [Masooda was eleven years old at the time.] Lifting the Veil, p. 46.
Recently a Muslim fundamentalist group in the Indian province of Kashmir demanded that women start wearing veils. When the call was ignored, hooligans threw acid in the faces of uncovered women. The Women of Islam, p. 56.
Next to education, women's health [in Afghanistan under Taliban rule] suffered the worst consequences of religious rule. The life expectancy of Afghan women now is just 44 years. There are 17 maternal deaths per 1,000 live births, the second worst rate in the world, just behind war-ravaged Sierra Leone.... A male doctor is not allowed to give a thorough physical examination to a female patient. Women had to be examined wearing the full burka. Male doctors sometimes had to stand in a hallway shouting instructions to a female assistant. A doctor could be imprisoned for talking to a female patient who was not fully covered. Lifting the Veil. p. 47.
As Riffat Hassan, professor of religious studies at the University of Louisville, puts it, "The Way Islam has been practiced in most Muslim societies for centuries has left millions of Muslim women with battered bodies, minds, and souls." The Women of Islam, p. 51-52

So what is behind all this Muslim terrorism of females, their requiring females to cover up with the veil, not allowing females to work alongside males, etc.? The core of it works like this.
Satan in religion teaches lies that claim God / Allah devalues the huMANity of females, thereby infecting the Muslims with the false belief that females are less than fully human.
Satan in religion also teaches lies that claim God / Allah exalts males, and thus that God exalts the penis, thereby seducing males into exalting themselves, practicing narcissism, obsessing on the penis and human sexuality, and even practicing penis worship (as is the case with the Hindus who worship Shiva, the Destroyer, only there, the penis is called a lingam).
Once women are degraded in the human mind as being less than fully human, they are treated as merely being lower animals who are to be treated somewhat like pets, only worse.
Once women are believed to be nothing more than lesser animals, the Muslim males feel quite free to use, abuse, and lose their pets.
Satan in the whore named religion also seduces his male disciples into practicing exceedingly wicked manipulative and controlling behaviors. Boom. In steps the demons of adrenaline's dope 'em mean intoxication. (That Muslims do so in a religion that outlaws the use of mood- and mind-altering chemicals is almost a funny. After all, the addiction to adrenaline intoxication is every bit as pernicious and deadly as is the addiction to any other mood- and mind-altering chemical. What hypocrisy!)
Then, doubly poisoned by false beliefs and the dope 'em mean intoxication of adrenaline that stems from practicing manipulative, controlling behaviors, the males are rendered mentally ill with false beliefs and totally out of control physically, emotionally, sexually, and spiritually.
Then they take their lack of self-control out on females.
That Satan in religion also seduces Muslims into becoming severely poisoned with the dis-ease of codependency is readily revealed in "honor killings." After all, why do Muslims slaughter females who step outside the edicts of their religion? So the male members can save face and keep looking good to their neighbors, right? After all, what would the neighbors think if the Muslim male gave his mother, sister, daughter... equal rights to practice autonomy? You Muslim males would become social outcasts for doing the right thing, right, Muslim male? And fitting in, being loved and liked, and receiving social acceptance is just soooooooooo important to you, right, Satan's disciples?

When I asked Muslim males who were in my religious studies college classes why Muslim females were forced to wear the veil, were not allowed to work alongside males, were not allowed to travel alone, etc., they said the male enforcers were merely trying to "protect" the females from being raped, or from indulging in fornication / adultery. All the while, the Muslim males are telling on themselves.
They are admitting that their religious beliefs render Muslim males so out-of-control sexually that if a woman shows her face in public, the Muslim male is likely to rape her -- an epidemic already exposed by Time's articles cited.
They are also admitting their own insecurities and fears -- admitting that their abuse of females is so severe that if a Muslim woman were to gain equal employment opportunities, she would likely divorce her domineering, abusive husband.

What further exposes Islam's males' insanity is that while they claim their oppressive edicts are designed to protect Islam's females, they instead exploit, enslave and imprison females -- holding them hostage shackled by MuhamMAD's false beliefs and edicts. And if a woman disobeys Islam's edicts, those same Muslim "protectors" will slaughter her! What great protectors Muslim males are, eh?

Satan babbles on.
5 A woman whose head is uncovered when she prays or prophesies is the same as praying or prophesying with all her hair shaved off, and a woman who has had all her hair shaved off is BAD, BAD, BAD because her husband is her head, and a bald-headed woman dishonors her husband. So there!

And that makes sense to you, eh, Christyin? So the woman who loses her hair while undergoing chemotherapy dishonors her husband, eh? But you Christyins do not inflict people with false guilt when you repeat Paul's crap, eh, Christyin?
6 Therefore, if a woman is not covered with the purdah or burka, thou shalt shave off all her hair!

Ooh, your Paul was such a sweet, tender-hearted guy, right, ChristYIN?!
Then if the culture in which you live decides that it is a shame for a woman's hair to be shorn or shaven off, thou shalt cover her head with the purdah, burka, or a wig! That way, you can hide the reality that we Christians terrorize females. Heh-heh.
7 A man indeed ought not to cover his head, because all males are the image and glory of God, so they need to show off their image and glory.

Well, aren't you Christian males S-P-E-C-I-A-L? But you Christyin glory hounds don't exalt yourselves when you repeat this crap, eh? And that's why you Christyin exhibitionists expose yourselves to little children in parks, eh? You're just uncovering your head which is the image and glory of Christ, eh? And that's why you call the toilet "the head," eh?
7 The woman, however, is merely the glory of the male, so she ought to hide her glory.

Are you aware of the original scriptures from which Paul makes his audacious claims? From his take on the story of the Creation, of course. Genesis 1.27: "So God created man in His own image. In the image of God created He him." The problem is that you careless Christyins didn't believe the remainder of that verse: "Male AND FEMALE created He THEM," did you? In its entirety, the verse reads:
So God created man in His own image. In the image of God created He him. Male and female created He them.

Had the Spirit of the Son of man been highlighting your studies of the Bible, you would have known that Genesis 1.27 is just one more time when God informs us that He includes females in the definition of man.

Looking up the meaning of another word, glory, also helps us to see through Paul's madness. Let's see here. Among the definitions glory are:
Praise, honor, or distinction extended by common consent. Renown.
A highly commendable asset.
Something marked by beauty or resplendence.
The splendor and beatific happiness of Heaven.
A state of great gratification or exaltation.
A height or prosperity or achievement.

So now your woman is your glory, eh, Christyin male? Well, isn't that S-P-E-C-I-A-L? So if SHE is your glory, why would you want her to hide out under the purdah or burka?

And all unmarried women and widows lack glory, eh, Christyin? But you are not viciously inSAULting females when you preach this crap, eh? Oh, no. Not you. After all, you're so holier-than-Thou that YOU are the image and glory of Jesus, right, Christyin?
8 Now you know that what I am saying is the truth, because back there in Genesis' story of the Creation, we are informed that the man was not made out of the woman. The woman, however, was made out of the man. Therefore, all males are more valuable than females because anything made from something else is of less value than the original article.

Oh, really? So an uncut diamond is more valuable than a cut diamond, eh, Christyin? And a dis-Spirited human is more valuable than a person who undergoes the complete psychic change to give birth to the Spirit of the Son of man, eh, Christyin? After all, if the premise were true, man in his original state who lacks the Spirit of the Son of man would be of more value than is the Spirit-led person, right, Christyin?
9 Furthermore, God did not create the man for the woman. Instead, He created the woman for the man. Therefore, males are of far more value than females. So there!

Oh, so when God-through-Moses says that God created woman as a "help meet for him," Genesis 2.20, you totally ignore the word meet and its definition which includes "to conform to, especially with exactitude and precision; a match," eh, Christyin? It just couldn't be that God created males and females as human equals who are designed to complement, comfort, and aid one another, and to propogate the human race, eh, Christyin? No, you would rather believe the following, right?
10 Therefore, because the woman was made out of the man, the woman ought to have the power of hair on her head. Also, she ought to have the power of hair on her head because of the angels.

Oh, but Paul isn't expressing the lunacy of a drunken skunk there, eh, Christyin? Well, then PLEASE tell us exactly how much power is provided in the hair of the human female. And what's up with this angel thing? What does Paul mean when he says, "For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head because of the angels"? I'll tell you what I think.
Paul was referring to all the artistic renderings of God's angels wherein most are shown as being females who have long hair. Even the Statue of Liberty and Lady Liberty are artistic representations of such angels.
An angel is a messenger. That means the female angels portrayed are renderings of women who speak up and write for God.
Thus, Paul was admitting that many of God's angels / messengers / prophets are females.

Therefore, Paul was intentionally seducing Christian women into believing that in order for them to look like angels, they had to have long hair -- which is ludicrous. While suckering Christian women that way, he was simultaneously:
denying women the right to freedom of speech so that the women who succumbed to his demandments would never become angels, and
commanding men to abuse and even murder the women who refused to succumb to Paul's will so those females would never have the opportunity to turn into angels.

What a sneaky slimeball! Flooded.
11 Nevertheless, no man would have been born without a woman having given birth to him.

I'll just bet you Christyins are exclaiming, "Wow, what a scientific GENIUS Paul was!" huh?
Neither would any woman exist without a man getting some woman pregnant. Well, she had to have gotten pregnant in the Lord, though. [Sic, sick, sick]

What's Paul doing there, Christians? Seducing you females into fantasying about having sex with Jesus while you're having sex with your husband, and seducing you males into fantasying about being Jesus while you're having sex with your wife, eh?
12 Therefore, the woman is a by-product of the man, and the man also exists by means of the woman having given birth to him. Even so, all things are of God. Babble, babble, babble!
13 What? You don't like my commandments regarding your forcing a woman to cover her head when she prays and prophesies? Well then, judge for yourselves, you dumbies! Is it comely for a woman to pray to God with her head uncovered? 14And doesn't even Mother Nature teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a shame unto him? Therefore, thou shalt worship and abide by the edicts of Mother Nature. So there!

Oh, so that's why you Christians display portraits of Jesus with long hair while condemning men with long hair, eh? And that's why you Christian artists portray Jesus with long hair in the first place, eh? You think long hair shames Him, and you like the idea of shaming Him, eh? What a surprise.
15 And doesn't even Mother Nature teach you that if a woman has long hair, it is a glory to her? After all, a female's hair is given to her for a covering, whereas a man's hair was given to him for him to cut off! So there!

And the Christians marvel, "Ooh, that Paul was SUCH a great logician!"
16 But if any man seems to be contentious when he hears that I issue commandments that tell males, "Thou shalt cut your hair and uncover your head!" and that I command females, "Thou shalt have long hair and cover your head!" just lie to him by telling him that we Christians have no such custom telling people how long their hair should be and whether or not they should cover their head when they pray and prophesy. And make sure to lie by telling him that the churches of God have no such customs, either.

Oh, but Paul is not the father of the lie and the whore who seduces you into living a lie and lying like Hell, eh, Christyin?

Who's Online

We have 72 guests and no members online