Xian and Muslim Sex Discrimination Confronted
Now watch the misogynist Paul seduce Christ-yins into practicing even more iniquity / discrimination.
I Timothy 5.17 Let the elders that rule well be counted worthy of double honour, especially they who labour in the word and doctrine.
18 For the scripture saith, Thou shalt not muzzle the ox that treadeth out the corn. And, The labourer is worthy of his reward.
19 Against an elder receive not an accusation, but before two or three witnesses.
20 Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear.
21 I charge thee before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, and the elect angels, that thou observe these things without preferring one before another, doing nothing by partiality.
22 Lay hands suddenly on no man, neither be partaker of other men's sins: keep thyself pure.
23 Drink no longer water, but use a little wine for thy stomach's sake and thine often infirmities.
24 Some men's sins are open beforehand, going before to judgment; and some men they follow after.
25 Likewise also the good works of some are manifest beforehand; and they that are otherwise cannot be hid.
Did you see it? No? Okay, let's run through it again.
I Timothy 5.17 Thou shalt provide double honor to the elders of the church who rule well, especially those elders who labor in the word and doctrine that I preach to Christians, 18because the scripture says, "Thou shalt not muzzle the ox that treads out the corn," (Deuteronomy 25.4) and, "The laborer is worthy of his reward."
So the reward you church elders receive for being dumb oxen who tread out the corn is double honor from your fellow Christian perishoners, eh? Some reward that is. Too bad you were too blind to see that Paul was seducing you into practicing the iniquity that sends people to Hell. And too bad that didn't believe:
"How can you believe which receive honor one of another and seek not the honor that comes from God only?" John 5.44
Let me explain the difference between receiving honor from our fellow man and the honor that comes only from God. I went to a meeting and took the risk of sharing a new enlightenment, and then sat there waiting for God to stroke me with His honor -- the comforts of the Comforter. He almost always strokes me when I dare to go against the grain and speak a new Truth. I didn't experience a stroke then, though, even though I could not think of one thing that I had said wrong.
After the meeting, another member of the program came up to thank me for what I had said because it helped her. Still, I felt nothing.
Only later did God kick in to provide me with the comforts of the Comforter to stroke me for what I had said. It wasn't that God was not pleased with what I had said in the first place. It was just that He wanted me to learn for myself that even if I received all kinds of honor from humans, human approval was NEVER going to make me happy. Only God can make me happy.
Now picture a Christian standing before God with the conversation running like this:
GOD: "What makes you think you deserve to enter Heaven?"
CHRISTIAN: "Well, I did not give any widow under the age of sixty one penny in financial support, and I showed double preferential treatment to the elders of my church."
GOD: "Who told you to do that?"
CHRISTIAN: "The great apostle Paul."
GOD: "Oh, really? And what justification did Paul use for commanding you to doubly honor your church elders?"
CHRISTIAN: "Well, he said, 'Thou shalt not muzzle the ox that treads out the corn,' and, 'The laborer is worthy of his reward. Babble, babble, babble!'"
Do you really picture that Christian entering Heaven? NOT!
Paul rants on:
19 Furthermore, thou shalt not receive any accusation against any of my hot-shot elders for anything they might have done wrong. Justice is not blind to MY elders! Instead, any accusations against my elders must be presented by two or three witnesses before those accusations will be considered as being potentially valid in a court of law.
Now take a whif of how women are treated like garbage in Islam to see if you spot how Paul's hog call for preferential treatment to Christian males / elders in a court of law aligns itself with the legal "justice" system of Muslim nations.
These quotations come from two articles within Time Special Report, "Lifting The Veil: The shocking story of how the Taliban brutalized the women of Afghanistan. How much better will their lives be now?" Time, Inc. New York. December 3, 2001. The articles cited are:
1 Lifting the Veil by Richard Lacayo, (a man, you feminist male bashers!) Reported by Hannah Beech/Dasht-i-Qaleh; Hannah Bloch and Matthew Forney/Islamabad; Terry McCarthy/Kabul; Jeff Chu/London; Jeffrey Ressner/Los Angeles; Alex Perry/Mazar-i-Sharif; Tim McGirk/Spin Boldak; and John F. Dickerson/Washington. Pages 34-49.
2 The Women of Islam by Lisa Beyer. Reported by Hannah Bloch/Islamabad; Amanda Bower/New York; Andrew Finkel/Istanbul; Meenakshi Ganguly/New Delhi; Scott MacLeod/Riyadh; Azadeb Moaveni/Tehran; Amany Radwan/Cairo; Matt Rees/Amman;' and Simon Robinson/Sana'a. Pages 50-59.
And in my opinion, these authors and reporters -- and Time for having the guts to publish these articles -- deserve the Nobel Peace Prize for their efforts. (If you sought to rile people into action with the goal of seeking the disarmament of sex discrimination, Time, you certainly succeeded in my case. Good for you!) Why do I say that Time had to have guts to print these articles? Because just everybody knows that today, the religion of Islam is the number one threat to the continuation of human life on planet earth! People -- including college professors and religious studies textbooks -- rarely dare to confront religion's madness. Why? Because of the idiotic world-wide social edict that claims, "It's not nice to confront other people's false beliefs," and because people live in great fear that confronting the world's religions and religiose for their obscene anti-God blasphemies and wickedness will result in World War III. Isn't that right, Time? Just how much flak do you receive for daring to go against the grain and informing the world of what the world's religions are really up to?
In Islam, women can have only one spouse, while men are permitted four. The legal age for girls to marry tends to be very young. Muhammad's favorite wife, A'isha, according to her biographer, was six when they wed, nine when the marriage was consummated. The Women of Islam, p. 52
And you think the pedophiliac Muhammad was one of God's prophets, eh, Muslims? Guess again. How do you feel about a man of today who forces himself sexually on a nine-year-old child? Can you not see that Muhammad's predatory sexual behaviors were despicably anti-God?
In Iran the legal age for marriage is nine for girls, 14 for boys. The law has occasionally been exploited by pedophiles, who marry poor young girls from the provinces, use and then abandon them. The Women of Islam, p. 52
God, help us! You Muslims are so deceived that you cannot see at all! Here. Let me help clear up your vision. Any man who would marry and/or have sex with a nine-year-old child is SUPER 666 / SICK, SICK, SICK! He is a rapist, a child molester, and a pedophile! That an entire nation condones pedophilia is absolutely absurdly bizarre, evil, and sadistic! No wonder you Muslim males are so mentally ill, terroristic, and out-of-control sexually.
[After the Russians withdrew from Afghanistan in 1989], Afghan warlords brought terror to the urban neighborhoods and villages they laid claim to. Young, undisciplined fighters treated women as plunder; rape became commonplace. Lifting the Veil, p. 44 Women in Dasht-i-Qaleh call rape "lying down" because it is so common that lying down quietly is the best way for a woman to cope. In a society that permits men several wives, the second or third wives, who tend to be younger and prettier, are vulnerable to rape by other males in the family. Lifting the Veil, p. 40
[Nevertheless, in neighboring Pakistan,] laws passed during an Islamization drive favor rapists and equate the testimony of one man to that of two women. The Women of Islam, p. 55.
The Koran [Islam's version of the Bible] allots daughters half the inheritance of sons. It decrees that a woman's testimony in court, at least in financial matters, is worth half that of a man's. Under Shari'a, or Muslim law, compensation for the murder of a woman is half the going rate for men. In many Muslim countries, these directives are incorporated into contemporary law. For a woman to prove rape in Pakistan, for example, four adult males of "impeccable" character must witness the penetration, in accordance with Shari'a. The Women of Islam, p. 52.
Oh, right. As if most rapists will perform their heinous acts of terrorism in front of witnesses.
Banaz [a 32 year old Afghan mother of seven] says this [being raped] happened to her sister, who was 14 when she was married off as the third wife of a local landowner. "It was a good marriage for the family," says Banaz. "But it was not a good marriage for her." She was raped by her husband's brother, a local mullah, whose prominence means that Banaz's sister has no hopes of retribution; it is her word against a holy man's. Lifting the Veil, p. 40.
Does that sound familiar, Christian -- like Islam's obedience to, "Thou shalt pay double honor to a church elder, and thou shalt not receive an accusation against an elder except by two or three witnesses!"? After all, a mullah is a Muslim of quasi-clerical class trained in traditional law and doctrine; i.e., a religious teacher. In other words, a mullah is essentially the equivalent of a Christian elder.
Muhammad and his boys merely expanded Satan's / Paul's demandments, however, so that males do not even have to be an elder of a church/mosque in order to receive the religion's protection from prosecution for their heinous crimes. All the Muslim person has to do is be born with a penis and zacka! He is automatically above the law, because that which constitutes Spirituality -- his heart, mind, soul, and efforts -- are supposedly centered in the penis thereby making males supposedly so superior to the heart, mind, soul, and efforts of any female he happens to rape. And you Muslim males wonder why you are nothing more than a bunch of dickheads!
And if you think Christianity hasn't done the same thing, think again. During the mid-evil ages when the Roman Catholic priests were the education hogs, priests were considered "above the law." If anybody dared to haul a Catholic priest into court and accuse him of having committed a crime, all the priest had to do was prove that he could read, and zacka! He was free from prosecution, and free to rape, pillage, and murder some more.
Paul's (and thus, Christianity's and Islam's) insanity continues.
20 Thou shalt rebuke in front of the entire congregation any of the remaining members of the church who sin, however, so that the other members of the congregation may quake in fear of being humiliated in front of everybody. That way, my codependent, people-pleasing sinners will walk around on eggs trying to hide their sins. They will never confess their sins, will refuse to work their amends, will refuse to ask for help to learn how to work through their sins and addictions, and will NEVER gain salvation. Heh-heh.
But there's no enticement to discriminate there, eh, Christian? By the way, do you obey all these demandments, Christian? No? Why not? Could it be that you yourself believe Paul's demandments are those of an egg-sucking dog?
So how does Islam obey Paul's demandment to "Rebuke before all!"? By taking it a step further and murdering women, of course.
Each year hundreds of Muslim women die in "honor killings"--murders by husbands or male relatives of women suspected of disobedience, usually a sexual indiscretion or marriage against the family's wishes.
Muslim nurses have also been murdered in "honor killings" for treating male patients -- for obeying God's commandments telling us to seek the salvation of human life, not its destruction. AARGH!
Typically, the killers are punished lightly, if at all. In Jordan a man who slays his wife or a close relative after catching her in the act of adultery is exempt from punishment. The Women of Islam, p. 55
And then there are all those horrific pictures on television of the Taliban's holding public executions wherein they hung and shot people in Afghan's soccer field for disobeying the Taliban's dictatorial lunacy.
Of course, it's not like world history isn't filled with Christians doing the same thing -- holding inquisitions, and public witch hunts and stake fries, etc. -- mostly to punish people who didn't mind them, and to scare everybody else into kowtowing to Christianity's dictators.
If you think Christians do not continue to participate in "honor killings" of women, guess again. In Brazil, the world's largest Roman Catholic nation, the behavior of a husband who cheats on his wife is socially acceptable. After all, according to Latin American Catholic perishoners, the male is merely expressing his machismo / masculinity. A wife's cheating on her husband, however, is not socially acceptable. After all, women supposedly possess less sex drive and more control over their sexuality, eh, you blind Cataholics? Besides, women are commanded by Paul and his Christian priestatutes to be in submission to the will of their domineering husbands. The will of the husband is, of course, that the wife remains loyal to him while he screws around on her.
As a result of Christianity's double standard promoted by the Roman ticks of Brazil's Cataholism, the physical abuse and murder of a woman by her husband or boyfriend has been accepted as a legitimate defense of honor made by the males' defense attorneys. If a husband beats his wife to death, and then accuses her of having cheated on him, all too often he gets away with murder because the Christian juries refuse to convict him. After all, according to them, she deserved to die for having cheated on him. He deserves freedom from punishment for his actions of screwing around on and murdering her, however.
The leaders of the Catholic church are powerless to confront and disarm this extreme injustice because they themselves promote the extreme injustice / iniquity that claims:
females are less than fully human and
are to be in submission to male dominance
to the juries / perishoners in the first place. In turn, the perishoners merely believe the lies and amplify them by failing to call for appropriate consequences for such horrible, whore-able crimes.
The Hindu spin-off of "honor killings" stems from the dowry system wherein Hindu parents actually pay males to marry their supposed sub-human daughters. Too many Hindu males have become so greedy that they will actually marry just to gain the females' dowry. Then the husband will murder her so that he can gain another dowry by marrying another Hindu woman, and then murder her and marry again ... When will the madness end?
"Honor killings" sure aren't going to end by promoting the beliefs of the remainder of the world's Eastern religions with their worship of dead ancestors. They, too, promote the belief that females are less than fully human. They claim that females are incapable of performing the right rituals and libations to honor their dead ancestors -- the hideous foundation upon which their religions are built. Thus, infanticide -- the murder of female infants -- is a huge problem in many Eastern nations. After all, giving birth to a female is so dishonorable, right, you penis-worshiping crotch pots?
The bottom line to this huge problem of abusing and murdering females that exists everywhere in the world stems directly from false beliefs promoted by the world's religions.
21 I charge thee before God, the Lord Jesus Christ, and the elect angels that you observe all these commandments that I am dictating to you without your showing any preference for one commandment over another! That way, you will not be showing any partiality. Well, except that you will be showing exceedingly discriminatory preferential treatment to males, of course -- doubly so to my elders. Heh-heh.
22 Thou shalt not lay hands suddenly on any man! If you do, thou shalt be a partaker of other men's sins! Thus, thou shalt keep yourself pure by not touching another man until you find out whether or not he is a sinner!
And you thought only the Hindu religion had the gall to categorize some people as being out-castes / untouchables, eh, Xyin? If you believe this dogmanure, P-L-E-A-S-E explain to us exactly how touching a sinner causes the sinner's sins to leap over into the person who touched him. ... Well, we're waiting....
Oh, by the way, Christian, have you noticed that you are again accusing Jesus of being impure when you promote this dogmanure? No? Well, take a look.
There came a leper to Him beseeching Him, kneeling down to Him, and saying to Him, "If you will it, you can make me clean." And Jesus, moved with compassion, put forth His hand and touched him, and said to him, "I will. Be you clean," and as soon as He had spoken, immediately the leprosy departed from him, and he was cleansed. Mark 1.40-42
So you Christians are so gullible, you actually believe that when Jesus touched and cleansed the leper, the impurities of leprosy jumped into Jesus thereby rendering Him impure, eh? AARGH! In reality, when Jesus cleanses us of our sins, dis-eases, and the demons that had possessed us, they are cast out as if they had been tossed into a Spiritual garbage can and hauled away to a garbage dump.
By the way, did you Christyins know that some Hindus get so carried away promoting their hideous caste system that young Hindu Brahmen bulls (the upper echelon of Hindu society) were actually jumping out of tall buildings with a single bound and setting themselves on fire in the middle of Main Street to protest the Indian government's legislation granting equal employment opportunities? How sick, sick, sick is that?
23 Drink no longer water, but use a little wine for your stomach's sake and your frequent infirmities.
And there is a dead giveaway that Paul is Satan-in-the-flesh. Paul knew that his Christyins would suffer serious medical problems due to their adherence to his sleazy, slimey commandments. In this instance, Paul is referring to stomach ulcers and diarrhea due to their attempts to obey Paul's sick, sick, sick commandments. So what do you Christian physicians think? Is it wise to pour a little wine on stomach ulcers? No? Then will you yet claim, "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works!"?
24 Some men's sins are openly revealed and exposed to public scrutiny before Judgment Day, but some sins are not performed until after Judgment Day. 25Likewise also, the good works of some are made manifest before Judgment Day, but a person's sinfulness cannot be hidden.
Well, we know that is certainly a lie, because Paul's great sinfulness has been hidden from mankind's view for nearly 2,000 years. How sad.
I will add, however, that many college-educated Protestant Christian preachers are aware that for nearly 2,000 years, people have expressed concern that Paul is the anti-Christ. In fact, that issue has been much debated. Apparently none of those concerned persons were able to prove their concerns so thoroughly, however. By contrast, God straight-out informed me that I won. What I write is going to convince people once and for all that Paul is indeed the anti-Christ. Then the Savior Himself disarms Paul / Satan, and He will have done so THROUGH me. In other words, the actual disarmament of Satan is God's job, not mine.
Having said that, however, each and every person is responsible for his own beliefs and behaviors. When each person willfully chooses to stop giving the world's religions control over himself to instead believe and obey the Savior One-on-one, the disarmament of evil will have begun. In fact, each of us MUST pitch in to help God do His job in order for Satan to be disarmed.
And to you Christian equal rights advocates, I tell you again that you must confront the sexism in your own religion first before the people of other religions will listen to you and seek equal rights for their people. Humans, especially children, are fairly well tuned into hypocrisy. For as long as you ignore the hideous sex discrimination promoted by your own religion, your efforts to disarm sexism stemming from the other religions of the world will remain unsuccessful.