The Misogyny of Paul (Part 2)

Xian and Muslim Sex Discrimination Confronted
On the way to being crucified, Jesus spoke the following words to women who wept for Him.
"Daughters of Jerusalem, weep not for me, but weep for yourselves and for your children, for behold, the days are coming in which they shall say, 'Blessed are the barren, the wombs that never bare, and the paps which never gave suck!' Then shall they begin to say to the mountains, 'Fall on us!' and to the hills, 'Cover us!' for if they do these things in a green tree, what shall be done in the dry?" Luke 23.28-31.

Now why do you suppose He said that, girls?
Could it be that He was referring to the horrific discrimination / iniquity that would be practiced against females and children due to the false beliefs promoted by the world's spiritually dry-as-a-bone religions? Yes.
And could it be that He was referring to what the religiose are going to say when God starts kicking asp for religion's horrible degradation, dehumanization, exploitation, abuse, and terrorism of females and children, and for the whore's misrepresentation of God and His Son? Yes, indeed.

Recent news articles -- especially those in the December 3, 2001 issue of Time Magazine -- have increased Americans' awareness of the Muslim world's brutalization of females. More than a few Christians are aware of the horrors, and are attempting to help Muslim women find freedom from the madness. An overwhelming problem attends such efforts, however -- that problem being hypocrisy. Until the discrimination within the Christians' own religion is confronted head-on, God as I understand Him will not allow the efforts of Christian equal rights advocates to succeed. Thus, I aim to perform that essential part of the task myself, and to show how Islam's misogyny is merely an extension of Christian misogyny. Then when Christian equal rights advocates admit that the discrimination against females within their own religion is obscenely despicable, the Muslims will be far more willing to listen and take heed to the call for equal human rights.

After informing me that Paul is the Anti-Christ, the Master led me to I Timothy, chapter 5 to show me Paul's misogyny; i.e., his hatred for and attacks on females. The scriptures are first cited as they are given in the King James version of the Bible. See if you notice any of Paul's vile sex discrimination (iniquity) for yourself.
I Timothy 5.1 Rebuke not an elder, but intreat him as a father; and the younger men as brethren;
2 The elder women as mothers; the younger as sisters, with all purity.
3 Honour widows that are widows indeed.
4 But if any widow have children or nephews, let them learn first to shew piety at home, and to requite their parents: for that is good and acceptable before God.
5 Now she that is a widow indeed, and desolate, trusteth in God, and continueth in supplications and prayers night and day.
6 But she that liveth in pleasure is dead while she liveth.
7 And these things give in charge, that they may be blameless.
8 But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.
9 Let not a widow be taken into the number under threescore years old, having been the wife of one man.
10 Well reported of for good works; if she have brought up children, if she have lodged strangers, if she have washed the saints' feet, if she have relieved the afflicted, if she have diligently followed every good work.
11 But the younger widows refuse: for when they have begun to wax wanton against Christ, they will marry;
12 Having damnation, because they have cast off their first faith.
13 And withal they learn to be idle, wandering about from house to house; and not only idle, but tattlers also and busybodies, speaking things which they ought not.
14 I will therefore that the younger women marry, bear children, guide the house, give none occasion to the adversary to speak reproachfully.
15 For some are already turned aside after Satan.
16 If any man or woman that believeth have widows, let them relieve them, and let not the church be charged; that it may relieve them that are widows indeed.

Did you see the great blasphemies and sexism in those scraptures? Apparently not, because not even feminists have been confronting this pig's slop. So let's go back through this garbage again to highlight what Paul was saying in full.
I Timothy 5.1 Dear Timothy,
Thou shalt not rebuke not an elder of the church. Instead, thou shalt treat him as if he were your father, the younger men as your brothers, 2the elder women as your mothers, and the younger women as your sisters as if they and/or you possessed all purity.

Right off the bat, Paul seduces Christians into practicing iniquity / discrimination.
Only males qualify to become elders in Christian churches. Thus, neither Anna nor Elisabeth -- both of whom were prophets -- would qualify as being "good enough" to be an elder in a Christian church. Peeyu!
Elders are to receive preferential treatment, and preferential treatment (status discrimination) is a humongous no-no that wars against God's will for mankind.
3 Honor widows that are widows indeed, 4but if any widow has children or nephews,
let her children and/or nephews first learn to show piety at home.
The way that her children and/or nephews shall show piety at home is by repaying their parents and/or aunt and uncle for all they have done for their children and/or nephews.
And the way that they shall repay their parents, aunt and/or uncle is by financially supporting their widowed mother and/or aunt,
for their financial support of their widowed mother and/or aunt is good and acceptable before God.

In saying that "thus and so" is acceptable behavior to God, Paul was presenting these scraptures as if they represented the will of God. And because Paul was issuing commandments, he was professing to be issuing God's commandments. All the while, Paul was expressing the exact opposite of God's will for mankind. And loud and clear, any person who misrepresents the will of God is in VERY hot water. That you Christians and Muslims so carelessly misrepresent God so severely in your attempts to promote your great propheteers -- Paul and Muhammad -- places every one of you in the hot seat big time!
5 Now she that is a widow indeed is she who:
is desolate,
trusts in God, and
continues in supplications and prayers night and day.

In saying, "Now she that is a widow indeed," Paul is claiming that a woman only qualifies as being a real widow if she meets his criteria. So any widow who:
suffered from horrible domestic violence, and thus, is not sorrowful over the death of her husband,
does not trust in God, or
does not continue in supplications and prayers night and day because she says the Lord's Prayer from her heart each morning, and she trusts God to hear her the first time she says it each day,

is not really a widow, eh, Christian?
6 But she that lives in pleasure is dead while she lives.

Paul is claiming that any married woman who takes pleasure in sexual intercourse with her husband is a horrible sinner who is Spiritually dead and damned to Hell. Thus, Paul is the same as claiming that:
God deems sexual intercourse within the confines of marriage to be a sin,
but only for the woman,
and only if she takes pleasure in it,
even though sexual intercourse has historically been the only means by which to propogate the human race.
And since God is the Creator of the means by which to propogate the human species, then
God is of evil because His Creative Design supposedly forces any married female who enjoys sex with her husband to commit sin.

And therein does Paul -- with great beguiling subtlety -- send the message that a particular human behavior is a sin when it is not, and in the process, falsely accuse and blaspheme God to the nth degree!

Do Christians believe that bull? You bet your sweet bippy they do. That is why the Cataholic popes issue decrees that:
claim sexual intercourse within the confines of marriage is not to be performed for the sake of the pleasure it provides, but ONLY for the purposes of impregnating the wife, and
accuse all married couples who practice birth control of being horrible sinners who are damned to Hell!

And that, boys and girls, is merely more ULTIMATE BLASPHEMY because:
God does not view sexual intercourse performed within the confines of marriage just for the pleasure of it to be a sin. Instead, the act is that of a holy union -- the primary means by which God joins the husband and wife together into one flesh.
God expects us to be responsible. Now that we have access to birth control measures, we are to be using them to produce only as many children as we can reasonably expect to be able to nurture and support appropriately while simultaneously taking care of our own needs and wants.

So what is the pope really up to when he issues such blasphemous edicts?
He is using Paul's lies as a means of promoting himself, of course. He wants Catholics to refrain from practicing birth control so that his Catholics will produce a higher population of humans to slave away for him, give him their money to make him even richer, and fight his wars.
He is directly responsible for the much of the over-population of our planet -- a problem far more severe than most people are willing study and accept as being the huge problem that it is.
He is inflicting married couples with false guilt, thereby making all too many of them sexually rigid. In turn, their sexual rigidity all too often destroys marriages that would have been beautiful unions otherwise.
By issuing his lie that birth control is a sin, he is commanding married couples wherein having a baby would threaten the life of the mother to refrain from having sexual intercourse altogether. Either that, or he is commanding the wife to go ahead, have sex without the protection of birth control, and get pregnant anyway. Thereby, is the male whore seducing her into committing suicide. What a fiend!
By inflicting married people with false guilt, commanding married couples wherein having a baby would threaten the life of the mother to refrain from sex altogether or go ahead without the use of birth control so that the mother will murder herself, and causing sexual rigidity, he is willfully defying the Lord's commandment, "What God has joined together, let not man put asunder." Matthew 19.6

Will those among you Christians who are actually so gullible as to believe that sexual intercourse within the confines of marriage that provides pleasure for the wife makes the wife a sinner yet profess that:
you do not make God sound like He does not have a lick of good sense,
you do not whoreably discriminate against females, and
you do not put asunder that which God has joined together?

Will those among you Christians who do not believe that sexual intercourse within the confines of marriage that provides pleasure for the wife is a sin yet continue to claim that everything written in the Bible is God-inspired?

Paul continues:
7 Make sure that the Christians obey my commandments, Timothy, so that nobody will be able to accuse them of having done anything wrong. 8And if any person who attends my church does not provide material and financial support for his own family, especially for those of his own house, he has denied the faith and is worse than an infidel!

Whoa! Since Jesus supplied no financial support for His biological family, Jesus is worse than an infidel, eh, Christian? Super-AARGH!
9 Thou shalt not let a widow become a member of the church UNLESS she:
is at least sixty years of age,
has been married only once,
10 is reported by other Christians as having performed good works, and has
brought up children,
lodged strangers,
washed the saints' feet,
relieved the afflicted, AND
diligently followed every good work.
11 But refuse to allow any other widow to become or remain a member of the church, for all Christian widows under the age of sixty will:
wax wanton against Christ,
marry,
12 and thus, have damnation as the result of marrying again,
because they will have cast off their first faith (i.e., they will have cast off their trust and belief in, loyalty and obedience to, being lorded over by their first husband),
13 learn to be idle,
wander about from house to house,
turn into tattle-tales,
become busybodies, and
speak things which they ought not to speak!

Oh, but Paul expresses no stereotyping and sex discrimination there, eh, Christian? How do you Christian women like having Paul so vilely stereotype and accuse you? Are you still wondering why God repeatedly refers to Paul as the accuser?

The asphole continues:
14 Therefore, thou shalt force my will on all Christians, Timothy! And MY will says that the younger widows should:
marry, so that they can live in pleasure and be dead while they live as they wax wanton against Christ, and have damnation from casting off their faith in their first husband, learn to be idle, and wander around from house-to-house being a tattle-tales and busybodies who speak things they ought not to speak. Heh-heh.
bear children,
guide the house, and
do nothing that gives our adversary the opportunity to speak reproachfully against them. So there!

The adversary to whom Paul refers is not Satan, but other people. Again and again Paul locked Christians into codependency; i.e., into walking around on eggs pretending to be something and somebody they are not in order to protect the false image they project of themselves.
Paul tapped into the beliefs and behaviors that disSpirited people hold to; i.e., beliefs and behaviors that war against the will of God, and are therefore of ultimate evil.
Then Paul promoted those false beliefs and behaviors as if a person who adhered to them would be expressing the will of God and performing righteous actions -- the direct opposite of the Truth.
In so doing, Paul established social norms wherein all Christians were supposed to believe and obey his edicts which were supposedly of the will of God, but were in reality the will of Satan.
And in the process, he locked them into codependency -- the prison of living a lie and lying like Hell due to their wanting to be loved, wanting to fit in, wanting social acceptance which they would receive only by adhering to Satanic social norms.

In direct opposition to codependency, God commands ALL of His children to work through codependency -- to dare to be different, go against the grain, oppose social norms, and endure being hated and persecuted for daring to be rigorously honest and speaking up against social norms -- people's wicked beliefs, behaviors, and character defects.
15 Some of those younger widows have already turned aside to chase after Satan, you know. 16Therefore, my edict is that if any man or woman who believes in me has widows in their family, they are to provide the financial support for those widows. Thus, thou shalt not let not the church be charged for providing those widows' with financial support, so that the church may provide financial relief only to those widows who are widows indeed. Take control! Force your will on them, Timothy! Heh-heh.

What a creep! Can you not see what is going on here people?
Paul found out that the members of his churches were providing financial support to poverty-stricken widows.
Those same churches were also sending money to Paul.
The more those church members gave to widows, the less money Paul received from them.
Thus, the old super-greedy thief Paul sought to stop his churches from aiding any and all widows so those churches would send more money to him.

He sought to succeed in his strong-armed robbery of widows by subtly commanding his churches to only provide financial gifts to widows who were at least 60 years of age (and at a time in history when few people lived to be that old). And even then, every widow 60 years of age or older had to have:
only been widowed once, (which excluded any woman who had been married more than once),
had no children or nephews to provide for her financial support,
been reported by other Christians as having performed good works (which is merely another call for people-pleasing codependency and her compliance to Paul's wicked edicts),
brought up children, (so that childless widows would be excluded),
lodged strangers, (which no widow with a lick of good sense would do),
washed the saints' feet (which in itself would exclude all Christian widows since no saints are members of Paul's churches),
relieved the afflicted, (which not only sounds vague, but dangerous depending on the affliction of the afflicted),
had diligently followed every good work, (which again is a demandment that widows perform evil deeds in compliance to Paul's edicts),
was desolate, (joyless; disconsolate; sorrowful due to separation from a loved one; showing the effects of abandonment and neglect; dilapidated; barren; lifeless; devoid of warmth, comfort, or hope; gloomy; alone),
trusted in God (which is impossible for any and all Christians), AND
continued in supplications and prayers to God night and day

so that NO WIDOW ON PLANET EARTH WOULD QUALIFY as being worthy of any Christian church's financial support.

So tell me, Christian, how is any human anywhere supposed to raise children, lodge strangers, wash the saints' feet, relieve the afflicted, diligently follow every good work, AND yet find time to continuously pray to God day and night? Could you do it?

How many saints can you honestly identify in your midst so you can know whose feet you are supposed to be washing in the first place?

And oh, by the way, when you Christians contributed money towards the support of the families of the victims of the 9/11/01 Muslim terrorists' attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, did you first demand that all widows meet Paul's requirements? No? Why not? Could it be that you are just a little bit more tender-hearted and caring than this asphole you're following?

But when you go around spewing, "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness so that the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works! II Timothy 3.16-17. So there!" you are expressing excellent judgment, eh? After all, these scraptures regarding how Christians are supposed to treat widows are included among those scriptures to which you refer.

The number one Christian response to the confrontation of such obscenely evil commandments issued by Paul is, "Well, Paul was only referring to those nasty Christian women who lived back then. So there!" Oh, so you're very sure that the widows to whom Paul referred were bad, bad, bad, eh? And it's okay with you that Paul commanded his churches to not provide any financial support to the widows of his day, eh? And it's okay with you that he placed all those burdens on 60 year-old widows, eh? But you're a really a tender-hearted, sensitive, sensible person who has gained salvation, eh?

Therein did Paul and his hard-hearted Christyins fulfill:
"Woe unto you scribes and Pharisees hypocrites! for you devour widows' houses, and for a pretense make long prayer. Therefore, you shall receive the greater damnation!" Matthew 23.14

And the Master also tells us:
"Do not you after their works, for they say, and do not. For they bind heavy burdens -- and grievous to be borne -- and lay them on men's shoulders, but they themselves will not move one of those burdens with one of their fingers." Matthew 23.4

Some of the other ways the Christians devour widows' houses include:

1) Christian preachers screaming, "Christ for sale! You can buy your way into Heaven. Give God your money by sending it to MY post office box! And make sure you GIVE UNTIL IT HURTS!" Little old widows,
preparing for death,
wanting to be sure they make it to Heaven, and
having been deceived by the Christians into believing that they can buy their way into Heaven,

are especially vulnerable to such scams. And all too many of them do indeed give to those Christian con artists until it hurts so much they even lose their homes.

2) The Catholic promotion the lie regarding the existence of purgatory suckers widows into slaving away like dogs to pay their priestatutes to pray their dead husbands' ways out of (non-existent) purgatory into Heaven.

3) Christianity's historical refusal to allow females to be educated left all too many widows absolutely destitute when their husbands died, because the widows lacked the know-how and resources to provide for their own financial support.

4) During the dark mid-evil ages, Catholic priests and friars would scour the countryside looking for rich widows who owned large manors. The priestatutes and friers would then accuse such widows of being witches, thereby seducing their perishoners into burning those widows at the stake. Then the Catholic church would confiscate the widows' property.

So how does Islam obey Paul's commandment to treat widows like manure? I'll let Richard Lacayo of Time tell you.
The Taliban barred [women] from all employment except for a small number of health-care jobs dedicated to women. p. 36. All schooling was forbidden to girls over the age of eight. p. 46 The ban on work for most women had a disastrous effect on schooling for both sexes, since as many as 70% of all Afghan teachers were women. Excluding them from the classroom meant that boys had few teachers to instruct them. p. 46 The work ban extended to widows, who were left no recourse but to beg -- in a nation with as many as a million widows -- out of a population of just 20 million. p. 46. "Lifting the Veil" by Richard Lacayo. Time Magazine. New York. December 3, 2001. Pages 34-49.

Now why do you suppose 1/20 of the population of Afghanistan is composed of widows? Because of Islamic Jihad, of course. See, Muslims are deceived into believing that if they are killed while terrorizing other people, the Muslim terrorists will get to shoot straight up to Heaven where they will get to participate in adultery/fornication with 70+ beautiful women. As a result, the illicit sex-addicted Muslims have warred like Hell against their fellow man from the time of their conception, thereby leaving behind a multitude of widows. Ain't that swell?

The lies regarding Islamic Jihad and sex orgies in Heaven are merely offshoots of the seductions of the whore named religion in the form of Christianity.
Islamic Jihad ("Holy War") is the same as Christian crusades. In order to seduce Christians into invading Jerusalem with the intent of conquering the "Holy Land" and handing it over as a possession of the Catholic pope, the pope promised his crusaders that if they were killed while murdering "infidels" (Jews, Muslims, and Eastern Orthodox Christians), those Christians would get to shoot straight up to Heaven for their acts of terrorism. And they were so gullible, they actually believed him! So severe was the bloodshed during the first crusade that the crusaders are reported to have been sloshing around in blood up to their ankles. God, help us!
The promotion of the whore-ifically false belief that sex orgies compose the delights of Heaven is also promoted by Mormon Christians.

So severe is the Shiite Muslims' take on warring on behalf of God in willful defiance of "You shall not kill" that they even hold rituals to exalt Islamic Jihad. The males don white shrouds, and then bong themselves on the head to make their scalps bleed. Then they run around in circles to increase their heart rate so the blood will flow more freely on their lily white shrouds. And in so doing, they are practicing bragging rites about how they are so willing to murder and die for Allah / God. All the while, of course, they are openly displaying their loyalty to Satan.

Thus, don't even try to convince me that Islam is not just another humongous Christian cult. I know better.
Christianity's head propheteer is Paul. Islam's head propheteer is Muhammad. Both are heads of Satan; i.e., Satan-in-the-flesh. Specifically, they are heads/kings numbers six and seven respectively. Revelation 13.1 and 17.10. And both of these propheteers / heads / kings promote essentially the same lies.
Both religions believe that Jesus was a prophet. Christianity extends that belief to His being the Son of God. Christianity is correct about that. Neither religion believes Him, however.
Both religions are divided into a multitude of sects-huns wherein they war against one another, too.

In fact, just the belief that Jesus was a prophet places Christians, Muslims, AND religious Jews in VERY hot water for their failure to believe Him. After all, what is the function of a prophet? To educate us about God and His will for man, and to teach us how to obey God's will so that we can enter the Kingdom of Ultimate Bliss: Heaven, and be with God for eternity. And our obeying the prophet's instructions first is what causes us to come to know of a certainty that the speaker/writer really is of God. Why? Because God Himself rewards us with the comforts of the Comforter for our obedience to the prophet's instructions. And those experiences of God cement our beliefs in what constitutes righteous beliefs and behaviors. In turn, our experiential knowledge of God also proves to us that the prophet who provided those righteous instructions is genuinely one of God's guys.

Thus, that the Christians, Muslims, and religious Jews:
readily admit their belief that Jesus was one of God's prophets,
and yet fail to believe Him and obey His instructions,
preferring instead to believe and obey the commandments of Satan himself in three of his eight primary human forms (Paul, Muhammad, and Ezra + Krishna, Lao Tsi, Buddha, Confucius, and Anton LaVey),
while readily admitting that they have no experience of God whatsoever,
and even having the gall to claim that proving God's existence is impossible. (Yikes!)

makes them ludicrous blasphemers and the blathering babblers of Babylon / Babble-on.

While we are on the topic of religion's great devouring of widows' houses, have you ever heard of the Hindu settee? What a piece of work that is. In the Hindu religion, when a husband dies, his wife is blamed for his death. Hindus are the same as screaming, "It's all YOUR fault, woman, that your husband died of a heart attack!" Thus, she is commanded to jump on her dead husband's funeral pyre and fry herself to death. How do they seduce her into doing so? By issuing Satan's lie that claims she will be "proving her virtue," if she commits suicide. If she refuses, she is presumed to be a woman who lacks virtue, and is treated like shit by the members of the community in which she lives -- including by her own children!

What is going on behind the Hindu settee? Well, like the remainder of the world's great religions, Hindus do not believe in educating women, thereby denying females of the means to support themselves financially and forcing them to marry. Then when the woman's husband dies, the greedy Hindus do not want to provide for her financial support, so their brahma bull men seduce her into frying herself to death. What a scam.

When the British colonized India, they were horrified by the Hindu settee, and outlawed it. Some Hindu widows still practice settee, however. God, help us!

Who's Online

We have 86 guests and no members online